Louis C.K. on Twitter and Tracy Morgan

21/06/11

(CNN) -- Louis C.K. makes a living by saying whatever he wants.

It's an enviable way to pay the bills but one that didn't come easily for the 43-year-old comedian. He's worked hard on projects, only to see them get canceled ("The Dana Carvey Show," HBO's "Lucky Louie") or, worse yet, altered by forces outside his control ("Pootie Tang").

But after years of paying his dues, he's finally found an acclaimed project that affords him complete artistic control with no external oversight. "Louie," the television show on FX that he writes, directs, produces and stars in, will begin its second season at 10:30 p.m. ET Thursday.

CNN spoke with Louis about his recent success, the ongoing controversy surrounding Tracy Morgan's comments on homosexuality and how you can't be funny on Twitter.

CNN: How much more work do you have to do on this season?

Louis C.K.: Oh, God, I've got so much to do. I have five, maybe six, episodes shot, edited and ready to go. So I have to edit the other seven, and I was making music the last two days, just finished that. I have to fill in a little more of the stand-up spots, and then I'll just be cutting and cutting and cutting. Then I have to promote the show; that's a lot of work.

CNN: Are you feeling anxious a week out?

Louis: No, I'm busy enough to not worry. I have enough to do. I get anxious when I have to do something, because the pressure is on me while I'm doing it. But this is done. The last worry on my mind is that episode. I want people to like it, but there's nothing I can do about that.

CNN: You have even more freedom this season than last, which is saying something. What was your reason for turning "Louie" into essentially a one-man show?

Louis: I just love all these jobs. I just love doing them. And weirdly, taking it all on makes it easier for me. When I'm writing, I know I'll be there to shoot it, so I don't have to make the script such a Talmud of information for the production crew; I'm going to be doing it. And when I'm shooting, I don't have to be concerned with dropping shots or leaving things out, because I know I'm going to be editing it. All that goes together.

CNN: Aside from those obvious benefits, is there any concern of going over the top since you don't have someone to keep you check?
Louis: If I have gone over some edge, I won't know it until everybody hates the season. But I think what's kept me from doing that thus far has been a fear of the audience. I've spent so much time in my life front of audiences, and I respect audiences, and I want to reach them. I'm not one of these people where like, "Oh, if only they would leave me alone, I could make this show the way I want to." The goal of this show and everything I do is to reach people with these ideas and stimulate them. I get so much pleasure out of people connecting with this stuff. When I'm doing what I really want, it's towards an audience.

I also have Pamela Adlon, who's my consulting producer and friend. She's a big sounding board for me. There have been a few things I've been really excited about and I've sent to her, and she's said, "This is bad. You gotta know this is bad." (laughs)

CNN: I liked the way your New York Magazine profile opened with the lengthy description of a masturbation scene from season two, because it was such an apt way of depicting how "Louie" is so different from everything else on television. Are you consciously trying to push the envelope?

Louis: No, I think I work it from the other way. "Pushing the envelope" sort of implies that you're inside the envelope with everyone else, and you're trying to find the edges on the outsides. I think of it the opposite way. I was a nerd growing up, and I'm a little antisocial and awkward. The s--- that climbs into my head is a little disturbing and strange, and it's hard to make people understand it. But I endeavor to. I'm outside the envelope trying to reach in, is what I'm saying. If I'm getting better, people like it more; that's the way I look at it. I don't look at it like I'm trying to get outside this thing I'm trapped in. I wish I was trapped in there; I'd be a millionaire.

CNN: You've said you make more money during a week of stand-up than you do in a season of the show. Does it help your work on "Louie" knowing you're not dependent on it to eat?

Louis: Absolutely. A hundred percent. It's why I got this much freedom on the show, because I was able to walk away. There's no stronger position to be in when you're setting up the terms for a TV show than, "If you guys don't wanna do this, I don't have to do this." I always had that. When they'd say, "Can we have say in the casting? It's very concerning for us to put people on the network when we don't even know who they are," my response was, "Totally. I feel the same way. Let's not do the show." (laughs) "F--- it." I get it. If I owned a network, I would never let a guy just put people on without telling me who they are. That was the position I was able to take. That keeps me very happy, yes. I love that I don't need it. I love it. All the pressure of that show is creative and wanting people to enjoy it. And that's enough. It's a huge amount of work. This job is the hardest job I've ever had.

CNN: In the wake of the Tracy Morgan controversy, you went on a bit of a Twitter rant. Is political correctness negatively altering our cultural dialogue?

Louis: I think it's always there. There are always people that get upset, and it's kind of cyclical, you know? I wasn't going to say anything about Tracy, because I just don't want the trouble in my life. You tend to get in trouble when you say stuff like that. But it stayed out there; it wasn't going away. So I felt like I had to because I live off the freedom to say what I want on stage. I didn't refute anyone's being angry. I just wanted to add my voice. I think there is plenty of people, a loud enough chorus, saying, "This kind of thing is unacceptable." When someone gets offended and they sound off about it, their issue gets a voice, so I don't think anything negative happened. The idea of how speech can hurt people and what people deal with growing up got a huge amount of airplay because of what Tracy said. So that's a positive. I just wanted to say what I thought, which was: He was joking. (laughs) He was kidding. He isn't a terrible person. He was kidding. Most of the flak I get from it is, "So you think stabbing people is funny?" OK. Go ahead and ask yourself that. That's fine. I don't know what to say to you. All that's good. All talking is good, negative and positive. Stabbing is bad; talking is good.

CNN: What are your thoughts on Twitter? You seem to use it in spurts, then avoid it.

Louis: I'd really like to be rid of it. I mean, I have a huge responsibility to everybody that works for me and gives me this job to promote it as much as I can. But if this season launches well and it feels like the show is in good shape, I might shut it down. I'm not motivated to entertain people through Twitter, so just by having Twitter and not saying anything, I make people mad. People write me, and they're like, "Why don't you f---ing entertain me?" Or they go, "Stop promoting yourself and say something funny." But I'm not a Twitterer! It's not my profession. It's not what I do. I just opened a Twitter account to tell people what's going on, and once in a while I get an impulse to say something.

I mean, Gilbert Gottfried, he's been saying a whole lot worse for years than he said on Twitter, and then when he said something on Twitter, he lost his job. He lost his livelihood! You know, it's f---ed up. Twitter is like making a press statement. It's very sober, and it's not funny, and the s--- just comes out very dry ,and people get upset.

That's what happened to Tracy. Tracy made a joke in a comedy club; that's the appropriate place to say terrible things. It's like sending somebody guitar chords and saying, "This is a song I heard. What do you think?" I don't f---ing know! Or strumming G, A, D. That's "Sweet Jane" by the f---ing Velvet Underground. That doesn't sound so good to me. G, A, D. I'm not getting it. And if you happen to be offended by the letters "G, A, D," you're going to be pissed off. And the guy's like, "No, no, you gotta hear the dude playing it and singing it." Oh, I don't know. All I heard was "G, A, D," and I don't like those letters. I was molested by a guy named Gad, so f--- you, you've offended me.
 
Sources: CNN.

Russell Crowe is sorry about his circumcision rant on Twitter

13/06/2011

 (CBS) - What seemed like an innocent question spiraled out of control on actor Russell Crowe's Twitter.

On June 9, after a fan asked the Oscar winner if he'd get his newborn circumcised, Crowe responded, "Circumcision is barbaric and stupid. Who are you to correct nature? Is it real that GOD required a donation of foreskin? Babies are perfect."

The rant didn't stop there.

Another follower said, "There's actually a scientific reason for [circumcision], u should google it."

Crowe replied, "My friend, 'human' science has caused too much damage, don't be a moron."

Then after a different follower pointed out that the practice promotes better hygiene, Crowe responds, "Hygenic? Why don't you sew up you're a** then?"

Crowe also tweeted at "Man With an Iron Fist" director Eli Roth, "I love my Jewish friends, I love the apples and the honey and the funny little hats but stop cutting yr babies."

The Twitter clash swelled as other comments were exchanged by Crowe and followers beyond circumcision, from comparing sexual mutilation to ceremonial acts to abortion and women's right to choose.

Later, Crowe deleted his posts on the subject - the heated ones - and apologized to everyone he might've offended.

"I have a deep and abiding love for all people of all nationalities, I'm very sorry that I have said things on here that have caused distress... My personal beliefs aside I realize that some will interpret this debate as me mocking the rituals and traditions of others. I am very sorry," Crowe tweeted.

Roth defends Crowe, insisting that the actor was kidding and accusing the media of "blowing the comments out of proportion."

Source: cbsnews.com.


LeBron James Should be Banned from Twitter, Game 6 After Now or Never Tweet

10/06/2011

Early Thursday morning, at around 3am, LeBron James decided it would be an outstanding idea to log on to his Twitter account and tweet to the world three words that will forever live in infamy: “Now or Never!!”

This tweet made zero sense…considering we were heading into Game 5 of a tied series, not an elimination game. I don’t know if LeBron realized that, but it really doesn’t matter since he seems to rarely think before he speaks… or tweets.

With this tweet, all LeBron did was put added pressure on his shoulders. Once again, he crumbled with the insurmountable pressure weighing down.

Despite a triple-double, LeBron and the Heat lost Game 5. The series isn’t over, but if we listen to James and Chris Bosh, it clearly is.

These are the words of the Heat’s biggest acquisitions last summer. Game 5 was now or never, they are either winning or losing the series based on Game 5. These two have zero confidence in their abilities to win two games at home.

That’s it. Game, set, match.

The best part about it—these aren’t the words of anybody from the media—these are the words from the two superstars Dwyane Wade recruited to South Beach to guarantee more than seven Championships as LeBron said.

Were you trying to convince your Twitter account that it was ‘Now or Never?’ You needed Twitter to hype you up for Game 5 of the NBA Finals? Are you kidding me!? Stay off Twitter—in fact, your agents should ban you from the account altogether.

Actually, you should be man enough to just delete the damn thing because you’re doing yourself more harm than good.

I said the series should have been a sweep. I said that you would go out there and prove the critics wrong for Game 5 immediately following the Game 4 collapse. I was wrong and in the process you made yourselves and your followers look stupid.

Sorry guys, but you failed.

LeBron and Chris, do yourselves a favor and don’t even bother showing up for Game 6, just stay in Dallas. If you don’t have the confidence in yourselves, why should I anymore?

Libya: William Hague Twitter chat

09/06/2011

By Christopher Hope, Whitehall Editor


The Foreign Secretary said that time was running out for Gaddafi and gave a first hand account of his visit to Benghazi on Saturday when he held talks with the National Transitional Council.

Mr Hague has fully embraced the microblogging website and has now done a number of Twitter Q&A’s inspiring the likes of London mayor, Boris Johnson, to get in on the act with his recent live tweet session.

Mr Hague did his first Twitter Q&A last year on his visit to Japan and has done some others on the Middle East.

Below is a summary of the discussion.
 

16.06 Mr Hague starts with a straightforward question from @insilicongenesis: "What was the extent of the devastation observed first handedly during your visit, Sir? Are they still in great need?"
Related Articles
Libya: rebels promised £780m by Western and Arab leaders 09 Jun 2011

He replies: "Human toll is the biggest devastation of all in any conflict - met people in hospital and heard appalling stories"

16.08 Mr Hague replies to @thoades: "There is a price attached to coming to the aid of other people, but the cost of not doing so would be far greater."

16.14 @flyinglawyer73 asks: "So we stay in #Libya no matter how long it takes to remove #Gaddafi? What about #Zimbabwe #Syria, the list goes on! And the cost?".

Mr Hague replies: "I can't put it better than the PM: just because we can't do everything doesn't mean we shouldn't do what we can."

16.24 @TTAMarshall asks: "Watching events in Syria and Yemen, has the international response been adequate? Does Libya tie our hands elsewhere?"

The Foreign Secretary replies: "No one can accuse Britain of being slow. We've led the way on Libya & Syria at the UN"

16.38 @K_H_Jordan asks: "When do you expect Tripoli, Libya will be safe enough for besieged citizens to rise up and take control?"

Mr Hague replies: "Time is running out for #Qadhafi. International community is united & his regime is starting to crumble around him"

(Incidentally, why does the Government insist on calling him Qadhafi?)

16.45 Some trickier questions coming up for Mr Hague. I wonder if he will answer them? @MrNorthice asks: "As a ridiculed leader who led his party to election collapse, why should we accept you as FS, from a party still w/o a majority?" while @jameelkaraki tables the question: "are u trying to restore the british glory in the region through Libya"?

16.48 @danielsilas asks: "Alain Juppe says Assad has "lost his legitimacy to rule the country Do you agree?"

The Foreign Secretary replies: "I think President #Assad should reform or step aside."

This is not new, and just restates Government policy. What would be startling if is Mr Hague just called for President Assad to step down. Nice touch that he includes the Syrian leader's hashtag though.

16.51 @sayed3li: "When do you think the #UK should walk the talk in relation to #Bahrain uprising? Dialogue needs solid ground,not bloody one".

Mr Hague replies: "We make clear to #Bahrain our view that national dialogue must lead to real progress & reform."

16.53 @manofchew asks: "You promise to "isolate those abusing human rights" yet it's business as usual with Bahrain. Why?"

Mr Hague replies: "It's not business as usual - we send strong messages to #Bahrain including on #humanrights & reform"

Er, but it looked like business as usual when Prime Minister David Cameron shook hands with the Crown Prince of Bahrain on the steps of Downing Street nearly three weeks ago.

16.54 @NaomiLGoldberg asks: "Will the FS and the British government condemn the human rights violations taking place in Syria?"

Mr Hague is unequivocal about the UK Government's disapproval (but he stops short of asking President Assad to stand down - see 16.48): "We do on a daily basis. What is happening in #Syria is unacceptable - that is why we want the #UNSC to respond"

17:00 @FredChukkawakka asks the Foreign Secretary to "explain why the UK treats #Syria and #Libya differently even though both leaders have killed their citizens to quell uprisings?" Very good question.

Mr Hague responds: "We don't treat #Syria any differently. But harder to build international support for a firm response over #Syria"

17:03 @hababbi asks: "Mr Hague after visitng Libya tell us what inspired you most to confirm the need for UK to continue to support for the ppl of #libya"

Mr Hague replies: "I was inspired by the enthusiasm of the people I met, their optimism & courage despite what they'd been through"

This question was tabled along with many others, according to Twitter, two days ago on 7 June, which leads me to wonder whether the Foreign Secretary is selecting questions that are hardly a challenge to answer.

17:04 @sjrlloyd asks again why Britain is treating Libya and Syria differently. Mr Hague cites the United Nations mandate as part of the problem: "clear intl mandate for action in #Libya, not in #Syria. Doing all we can to pressure #Assad regime to stop killing"

17:07 @CharlieLewis_ asks: "Is there a possibility of intervention in syria as sanctions don't seem to have worked and casualties are mounting?"

Mr Hague is convinced that sanctions are putting pressure on the regime: "sanctions are putting pressure on the regime. Pressure will only increase unless they change course"

17:13 A bit left field. @NaomiLGoldberg asks "How does Mr Hague feel about the Scottish boycott of Israeli books? http://www.west-dunbarton.gov.uk"?

The Foreign Secretary replies: "I oppose boycotts of #Israel - they are counter-productive, polarising & shut down dialogue"

17.21 @RenaSadeghi asks:"Where does Britain stand from continued Israeli settlements in Palestine? Do democracy and int'l law get applied to Israel also?"

Mr Hague replies: "International law applies everywhere. #UK view is that settlements are illegal and an obstacle to peace"

17.23 I wonder why the Foreign Secretary chose this one (tabled yesterday) from @scotiatide: "No question, just want to thank the UK for protecting the people of Libya in their time of need - well done"

He replies: "Thank you - we will see the job through until UN resolutions are fulfilled"

17.24 Good question from @Jnugteren: "The British are using #helicopters and #jets. What is between groundforce intervention and the current situation?"

William Hague replies convincingly: "a huge difference. UNSC 1973 rules out occupying force & we will stick to it.UN mandate gives our moral & legal authority"

17.30. And it's all over. @williamjhague tweets: "Thanks for all your questions. Sorry I couldn't answer them all. Transcript available soon"
 
Sources: telegraph.co.uk

$1 million for a Twitter background: sold!

11/06/2011
A young man of 20 monetized his Twitter account in an unusual way. It was not just selling tweets. He put up his Twitter background for sale for $ 1 mil. A rather stupid and unrealizable idea turned out to be one of the most successful in the history of Twitter.
@fruitblob has told his friends about the idea and placed only one ad somewhere in the web. The result didn`t take long to appear. Seven months passed. Three large companies and one corporation contacted him in order to buy the place for advertising (the right to place their own background in his Twitter account), but they were late. A couple of days before, in June, 2011 the background was sold to some anonymous businessman who turned out to be a fan of Chelsea FC.  Now one can observe 8 Chelsea badges on the background.


The guy earned $ 1 000 000 for the background (they say the money went to charity). He is now selling the link under his bio in Twitter. In fact, any link is more functional than a background. Chelsea fan might have waited a little to buy it instead of a background) Anyway, the price is the same – the guy is sure to get another million.
This story resembles Alex Tew`s “The Million Dollar Homepage”. The image-based links on his site were sold for $1 per pixel. The guy just wanted to help his parents and to pay for his education. His project was cloned many times, but no similar site reached a success. Why is that so? All those projects failed, because they lacked for social movement. Alex Tew`s site is stagnating now and Twitter, Facebook, Tumblr, Myspace accounts are constantly expanding every day. That is why Twitter-based and other social network marketing projects have more chances to be successful, than isolated sites.  
  Internet marketing seems to acquire a new trend. Instead of selling ads and links at low prices, people invent immediate methods of getting rich, selling the same ads and links for big money. Social networking services gradually supersede all other web resources. Thus, people want to wage their promotional campaigns in Twitter (200+ million users), Facebook (600+ million users) and Myspace (30+ million users). We live in a new era of social marketing. Such people as Guy Kawasaki (360 000 followers), Robert Scoble (180 000 followers),  Charlie Sheen with his Twitter advertising (4 million followers) and @fruitblob with his million dollar twitter background form the basis of social marketing.  
       
Tags: Washington Post, Twitter News, New York Times Twitter, Twitter Background, Million Dollar Twitter Background

Tweeting change in Arab journalism

11/06/2011

Yasser Hareb writes: Traditional technology and content driven by reputation do not meet the expectations of young readers raised on Facebook and Twitter
By Yasser Hareb, Special to Gulf News

During the Arab Media Forum, held in Dubai last month, I could feel the concern traditional media outlets had towards social and new media such as YouTube, Facebook and Twitter. What struck me the most, however, was that those who belong to traditional media still debate whether or not new media is able to overcome traditional media. What they have yet to realise is that new media has gone far ahead of the game; in terms of technology and content and the broader audience base it has.

On YouTube's statistics page it reads that the video content uploaded on YouTube every 60 days equals the total production of all American TV stations over the past 60 years. Each day, users view two billion video clips on YouTube alone. Despite the fact that Arab media outlets have been discussing the effect of online journalism since 2004, they are still holding on to traditional technology and content which does not meet reader expectations. The new generation simply cannot tolerate long introductions to news bulletins, and talk shows no longer appeal to viewers as much as they did 10 years ago, especially when they discuss politics.

The success that some satellite stations achieved during the recent Arab uprisings was due, in large part, to content provided by young people on the ground using things like mobile phones. However, the number of people who followed the news on Twitter and other social media websites was not less than the number of people who watched it on TV. When half of the population in the Arab world is under the age of 25, it becomes a fact that half of the media's targeted audience is young people using smart phones and new means of communications. Those young people do not want to sit and watch news bulletins on TV and will not be disappointed if they miss a certain programme; nor will they wait for the re-run. They have their own understanding of media and in order for the media to reach them; it has to be available via their smart phones and in their online communities.

Simple language

Furthermore, we have seen new names emerge from these young social media addicts. They have started playing an important role in the social and cultural movement, in the Gulf region at least. It would be naive to ignore their roles just because they are young when compared to prominent intellectuals and thinkers.

Writers who are active on Twitter were the real stars of the Arab Media Forum. Almost every one of them was surrounded by a group of people wanting to chat and exchange ideas or just to take photographs with them. During the sessions, those young Twitterers were the closest to the ordinary people, and they were able to address the problems facing the society in a simple way. Their speeches were not pre-written or printed; like a lot of the other speakers. They didn't try to use sophisticated terms and concepts to impress the audience.

Rather, they used the same language an ordinary person uses, the language derived from people's everyday lives. It did not matter whether these stars carried deep knowledge or not. What mattered was that technology has imposed them on the scene and they have become influential.

I noticed that many of the big names in Arab journalism, who have been writing for decades, did not get the same attention as these young writers received, because those big shots haven't taken new media seriously yet. They still write their articles by hand and fax them to the newspaper for publication. They still live in the past and like to talk about it, and they still, to a great extent, address only the elite. Many of them are unable to comprehend the changes that have happened in Arab societies and they cling to their traditional daily columns. They simply cannot compete with the modernisation that's sweeping the world. In an article published in Success magazine last March, Darren Hardy says that by 1900, it had taken 150 years to double all human knowledge. Today it takes only one or two years, and by 2020, knowledge will double every 72 days.

Some of the ‘veteran' writers accuse me of too often taking the side of young people and defending their thoughts. But, let's be realistic. With all the changes we have been witnessing, it's imperative for every writer, intellectual and author to keep pace with the changes, to be close to society and talk ‘with' the people not ‘to' them. The next stage does not need preaching nor theoretical speeches. Writers have to address the needs of people in a realistic manner. The role of the regular simple man is playing should not be stultified because the regular man is no longer as simple as we might think.

As for those who do not believe in modern technologies or in the young generation, they have alienated themselves from the social movement and are no longer able to help shape public opinion. New technologies are not simple means of entertainment or tools to pass time; they have become an integral part of life today. I wish to see Arab writers and intellectuals come down from their ivory towers and socialise with the society, so that both sides can understand each other better.



Yasser Hareb is an Emirati novelist and writer on political and social affairs.You can follow him at www.twitter.com/YasserHareb
 

Kanye West Somewhat Silent On Twitter And In The Media

06/09/2011

Along with sweeping productions, capable rhymes and a knack for head turning fashion, Kanye West was also infamous for his sometimes bristling persona and presence in the media. However, it seems as if the Chicago superstar has fallen off the media and social network grid and it has become more noticeable even as Kanye still makes the occasional headline or two.

Yeezy’s reluctance to deal with media is certainly understandable, given the many squabbles and contentious battles he’s had with the press during his rise to infamy. Kanye’s erratic behavior may have inspired the media attacks, such as him rushing the stage at the 2009 MTV Video Music Awards during Taylor Swift’s acceptance speech. Kanye also has thrown tantrums and the like, using the press as his sounding board which only seemed to garner him more negative media attention than he hoped for.

Kanye West and his infamous war of words with Today show host Matt Lauer last November has gone down in infamy as one of the classic examples of the outsized personality of the star rapper and producer. It also marked the beginning of a growing media silence as Kanye has not granted any major news outlet an interview since, unless one counts a curious silent interview he gave to NY Mag back in January at an exhibit for My Beautiful Dark Twisted Fantasy album cover artist George Condo.

At Tuesday’s (June 7) Council of Fashion Designers of America (CFDA) awards in New York, which featured Fashion Icon award winner Lady Gaga, a casually dressed but still fashionable Kanye chatted up other actresses Liv Tyler and Chloe Sevigny on the carpet but frequently denied reporters any interviews by saying, “Sorry, I don’t do interviews” – which was as much he’s said in months to the press.

Keeping with this newly mute theme, Kanye has not used his popular Twitter page since March 15. When Kanye first joined the social media network, it was treated as a world event by some in the blogosphere and the micro-blogging site was a perfect playground for Kanye’s frequent thoughts. Many were able to get a glimpse of the man as he casually tweeted photos of his travels, his belongings and even brief anecdotes of his personal life. Kanye even took to Twitter in February to praise Internet darlings Odd Future and their leader Tyler The Creator, boldly stating that Tyler’s “Goblin” video was the best of 2011.

To be fair, Kanye did openly speak to the media somewhat at a recent event for his longtime protégé from Detroit Big Sean at a invite-only listening party for the Motor City rapper’s highly anticipated Def Jam debut Finally Famous. While Kanye didn’t exactly toil about in a media pit, he did join Sean onstage at the Standard Hotel Tuesday (June 7) night in New York City and expressed adoration and admiration for his mentor producer No I.D. and Big Sean. No I.D., producer for Common’s earlier work, produced the bulk of Big Sean’s upcoming release and is responsible for teaching Kanye how to make beats.

While Kanye’s silence is indeed deafening considering how many media sound bites he has provided over the course of his career, speculations abound that Kanye may be thrusting all of his focus into his other endeavors such as his reported fashion line and the upcoming joint album with longtime ally Jay-Z Watch The Throne. Forever the enigma, Kanye West continues to intrigue his fans and the media with each of his subtle and increasingly calculated moves.